Summary: a simple rating system
Version: 2007-04-18
Prerequisites: pmwiki-2.2.0-44betas
Status: Stable
Maintainer: Pm
Categories: test

Questions answered by this recipe


For now, this is a test page for a simple rating system.


Comments and ratings

Feel free to leave comments here. To give a rating for this recipe, use an asterisk followed by your name and a rating of +5 (great) to -1 (worse than useless). For a rating of zero, use "+0".

  • Pm +5
    Note that it's relatively easy to leave comments along with the rating.
  • Alice -1
    What a terrible idea.
  • Bob +3 short comments can be inline
  • Carol +2
  • Dave +3
  • SteP +0 first rating
  • SteP -1 second rating
  • SteP +5 final rating
  • Kathryn Andersen +2
    It's okay, I suppose.
  • Sandy +3 useful for audience looking for recipes, familiar with pmwiki editing, less useful for writers.
  • PKHG +5 I like the idea that newbies can see, what is rated high (useful?! ;-))
  • +2 what happens if no name given?
  • -5 xxx
  • +10 yyy
  • -5 who
  • 0 not entirely clear on how this is supposed to work -- I'm just editing the page, not adding a comment or such.
  • +2 eeee
Answer: have a look at the "Rating" entry in the Cookbook description box.
  • ThomasP +4 interesting and indeed simple; and even better: can be used for surveys etc. as well
    (Will there be a designated environment in which the bullet boxes will be parsed?)

See Also

  • VoteCounter Count & summarize votes. Votes indicated by an asterisk followed by a rating in parentheses followed by optional comment


User notes? : If you use, used or reviewed this recipe, you can add your name. These statistics appear in the Cookbook listings and will help newcomers browsing through the wiki.