Summary: User notes for the SectionEdit recipe.
Discussion: SectionEdit-Talk
Users: +10 -1

If you use or used the SectionEdit recipe, you can add yourself in the list below. These statistics may help newcomers to select recipes for their wikis. Both (+) positive and (-) negative short comments are welcome. For longer comments or questions please use the SectionEdit-Talk page.


You can edit this page and add your name.

  • (+) Works great for wiki, makes editing long pages a lot easier. JPC
  • (+) Works great for my notes wiki, makes editing specific sections that little bit easier. DaveG
  • (+) Rik Blok? February 21, 2010, at 06:54 PM
  • (-) I used a former version, and ceased as I most often do all the page edit. gb
  • (+) if you have many sections on a page you will need this to maintain the overview. Give it a try. Matthias G√ľnther February 21, 2010, at 03:35 PM
  • (+) Former versions were disappointing. Current one is perfect for me. -Armin
  • (+) A must use! Farvardin
  • (+) A little bug with include directive below the title of section. It opens a window of edit of the page wich is include.Benji January 09, 2014, at 07:02 AM
  • (+) Works great! However there are depreciated "preg_replace /e" functions in version 2.2.3. See PITS - 01319. rsanders?
  • (+) I've used it before. Need to reimplement on my own site now that some pages have grown so large! - MichaelPaulukonis March 15, 2014, at 03:53 PM
  • (+) Great idea, but has a conflict with the PreviewChanges recipe. See SectionEdit-Talk. – bttr January 09, 2018, at 03:03 PM

PLEASE PUT YOUR ENTRY DIRECTLY *ABOVE* THE [#usersend] LINE. The format should be: asterisk, either + or - in parentheses, comment, your name or profile link For example (obviously without the at the beginning): * (+) comment-text name?


User notes for the SectionEdit recipe (talk).